AFrame alternative
AFrame builds tasks from the dates you enter.
Ava reads the contract so the dates come to you.
AFrame generates tasks from key dates you enter and provides action plan templates, which means the dates still have to reach the system through you. Ava reads the executed contract at intake, pulls every date, party, and contingency out of it, and matches every email about the deal to the right file.
Your first transaction is free · No credit card required · Nothing to configure
Quick answer
What is the best AFrame alternative?
ListedKit AI is the AFrame alternative for transaction coordinators who do not want to be the data entry step. AFrame generates tasks from key dates you enter and provides action plan templates, so the dates have to reach the system through you first. It announced AI and analytics features in 2026 but has not shipped contract reading or inbox intelligence. Ava reads the executed contract so the dates come to you, not the other way around, and matches every incoming email to the right deal even when the subject line has no address. ListedKit AI is $14.99 per contract intake, with your first transaction free and no per-seat fees.
Trusted by real estate teams across the country
The real problem
A task engine is only as fast as the person feeding it dates.
Task generation from key dates is a real feature and it does real work. The catch is where the key dates come from. Someone has to open the executed contract, find the acceptance date, find the inspection window, find the financing contingency, and type each one into a field before a single task can fire. The automation starts after the reading, and the reading is the slow part.
The same gap sits on the inbox side. The lender's message with no address in the subject line, the addendum that moves three dates at once, the title company reply that changes the closing: none of that becomes a task until a person notices it and updates the record by hand.
“That's what I do, I do it manually for every transaction and it's annoying.”
A ListedKit customer · On building timelines by hand
How the switch works
One deal, two layers.
The transaction you are running today does not stop while you move. Ava runs the coordination layer from intake forward, and the manual entry you have been doing runs alongside it until you no longer need it.
Reads the contract
Purchase agreement, counters, addenda. Every date, every party, every contingency.
Catches every email
Matched to the right deal by context, even with no address in the subject line.
Builds the timeline
Your state's rules, business days and federal holidays counted correctly.
Follows your checklist
Give Ava the action plan you already use once and it keeps it exactly as written.
Read it yourself first
The dates only exist in the system once a person has found them in the document.
Then the tasks fire
Everything downstream waits on that first pass through the contract.
The dates come to you.
Not the other way around. Upload one executed contract and Ava reads it, extracts every date and party, and builds the timeline before you have typed a field. That is the whole switch.
Two layers · One deal · Nothing to configure
Who owns what
ListedKit AI and AFrame, job by job.
Every job in a transaction, and which layer it runs on. Read it as a division of labor, not a scorecard.
| Job in the transaction | Runs on |
|---|---|
| Reading the executed contract at intake | Ava |
| Extracting every date, party, and contingency | Ava |
| Catching every email about the deal and matching it to the file | Ava |
| Building the timeline to your state's rules | Ava |
| Following your brokerage's own checklist and rules | Ava |
| Telling your team what needs to happen next | Ava |
| Generating tasks from the key dates you enter | AFrame |
| Providing action plan templates | AFrame |
| Getting the dates out of the contract in the first placeWhere the switch happens | Ava, from day one |
The bottom line: generating tasks from key dates is useful, and AFrame does it. The question is who finds the dates. Ava is the layer that reads what is inside the contract and what is arriving in your inbox, so the dates exist before anyone has typed one.
Making the move
Switch on one contract. There is nothing to configure.
Bring the action plan you already use
The task sequence your team runs on every deal does not have to be rebuilt. Ava reads into it rather than replacing it.
- Export the checklist or action plan your team runs today.
- Paste it into Ava once. It keeps it exactly as written, with no templates to rebuild and no transaction types to configure.
- It dates it from the contract it read, on every deal, in every state.
Connect the inbox the deal already lives in
Ava connects to Gmail, where the transaction is already happening. Your process stays yours. It fills it in faster.
- Connect your email. Every message about a deal lands in the right file.
- Upload the executed contract. Ava reads it and builds the timeline.
- Confirm what it found. The extraction work is its, the review step is yours.
What the coordination layer costs
Priced per intake, not per seat.
Your first transaction is free, and volume discounts run up to 27% off. There are no per-seat fees, so your cost never scales with headcount and the whole team runs on one account.
Against a transaction coordinator at $300 to $500 per transaction, or against the forty five minutes per file you spend reading the contract yourself, the math works either way. To run it for your own volume, use the free TC cost calculator.
Customer voice
From people who stopped typing dates into fields.
Verified G2 reviews, verbatim. Role attribution only.
“I love the thinking done for you. One of my favorite functions is the auto moving of dates when an addendum is updated. I love that it pulls all contact information from email.”
“I really find the task lists helpful, they pull directly from the contract.”
“The best features I like about Listed Kit are the accuracy with which the AI engine pulls dates and contacts from contracts.”
“AI utilization helps us manage our deals more effectively and stay on top of our key dates.”
Questions
ListedKit AI and AFrame, answered.
What is the best AFrame alternative?
ListedKit AI is the AFrame alternative for transaction coordinators who want the contract read for them. AFrame generates tasks from key dates you enter and provides action plan templates, which means the dates reach the system through you. Ava reads the executed contract so the dates come to you, extracts every party and contingency, builds the timeline to your state's rules, and matches every incoming email to the right deal.
Does AFrame have AI features?
AFrame announced AI and analytics features in 2026, but it has not shipped contract reading or inbox intelligence. ListedKit AI's Ava reads executed contracts today and connects to your Gmail, matching every message about a deal to the right file even when the subject line has no property address in it.
What does Ava read at intake?
The purchase agreement, the counters, and the addenda. Ava extracts every date, every party, and every contingency, including the details agents miss, then builds your timeline to your state's rules with business days and federal holidays counted correctly. It shows you what it found and you confirm it, so the reading is its and the review step is yours.
What does ListedKit AI cost?
ListedKit AI is $14.99 per contract intake, with your first transaction free and volume discounts up to 27% off. There are no per-seat fees, so the whole team runs on one account, and there is no fixed monthly cost on a slow month. You pay for the coordination layer only when you open a file.
Will Ava follow my brokerage's rules and my market's norms?
Yes. Ava has a built-in rules section where you write your brokerage's rules, your market's norms, and how your team handles deals, in plain language, with no configuration required. It applies those rules when building timelines and calculating deadlines on every deal, in all 50 states.
Do I have to rebuild my checklist to switch?
No. If you already have a checklist or an action plan you run on every deal, give it to Ava once and it keeps it exactly as written, then dates it from the contract it read. If you do not have one, it builds it from the contract. Either way there is nothing to configure first.
Keep comparing
ListedKit AI next to the other tools.
Best TC software
How the transaction coordination tools compare on the work that happens before closing.
ReadListedKit vs Dotloop
Keep your compliance archive. Ava runs the deal before it gets there.
ReadOpen to Close alternative
Open to Close is what you build. Ava is what you connect.
ReadFolio alternative
Folio organizes your inbox around transactions. Ava runs the transaction from your inbox.
ReadPaperless Pipeline alternative
Paperless Pipeline organizes what you upload. Ava surfaces it before you go find it.
ReadSisu alternative
Compare ListedKit AI to Sisu for real estate transaction management.
ReadTC Docs alternative
Compare ListedKit AI to TC Docs for contract intake and transaction summaries.
ReadStop feeding the dates in. Let the contract hand them over.
Upload one executed contract and watch Ava read it, pull every date and party, and build the timeline before you have touched a field.
Your first transaction is free. No credit card required. Nothing to configure.